Microsurgical Treatment of Female Tubal Infertility: Effectiveness and Outcomes

Authors

  • Rasulov, J. D., Republican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after Academician V. Vakhidov, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Alohano, L. B. Republican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after Academician V. Vakhidov, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Murodullaev, J. S. Republican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after Academician V. Vakhidov, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Microsurgery, tubal infertility, fallopian tubes, laparoscopy

Abstract

Tubal infertility is a prevalent cause of female infertility, frequently arising from injury or occlusion of the fallopian tubes. Recent advancements in microsurgical procedures, especially those employing laparoscopy, have provided excellent therapy alternatives for restoring tubal function and enhancing reproductive outcomes. This article evaluates the efficacy of microsurgical techniques for tubal infertility, encompassing reconstructive treatments like tubal anastomosis, salpingostomy, and adhesiolysis. The efficacy of these treatments is contingent upon various factors, including the extent of tubal damage, the patient's age, and the existence of additional reproductive health issues. Laparoscopic surgery, a minimally invasive technique, has significant advantages including less postoperative problems, abbreviated recovery periods, and minimum tissue damage. Although success rates fluctuate based on individual circumstances, microsurgery is a realistic and frequently effective intervention for restoring fertility in women with tubal factor infertility. Additional research and tailored treatment strategies are crucial for enhancing long-term results.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-13

How to Cite

Rasulov, J. D., Alohano, L. B., & Murodullaev, J. S. (2024). Microsurgical Treatment of Female Tubal Infertility: Effectiveness and Outcomes. American Journal of Pediatric Medicine and Health Sciences (2993-2149), 2(12), 97–101. Retrieved from http://grnjournal.us/index.php/AJPMHS/article/view/6324